tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11170601366607040162024-02-20T05:01:19.263-08:00Dead Fish Moon Dream #9heebeegeebeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13691436543953333540noreply@blogger.comBlogger20125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1117060136660704016.post-49417477931309302212016-11-01T00:23:00.001-07:002016-11-01T00:23:52.875-07:0010th anniversary notes - In the FutureOk, so there's 2 short EPs that are planned for next year. The first is definitely called <i>Gossamer Peel Shreds</i>, and is more of a pseudometal album, and is a bit different than the usual material. It might be out sometime in the spring.<br />
The second is currently called <i>Computer Space</i>, and is going to be like Robot MonStar and Basic. It's probably going to be the last of that style too, because I want to start incorporating the keyboard in different ways in the future.heebeegeebeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13691436543953333540noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1117060136660704016.post-48941213413237251662016-10-16T15:44:00.001-07:002016-10-16T15:44:22.693-07:00Lum notesLum (2016) is the 8th album, and also is the 10th anniversary of the first album. It was originally going to be titled "Image & Sound", partially in reference to the song, Warming Glow, and partially in reference to David Bowie. The album artwork was also different and had been finalized early on, but was scrapped when the title changed a little over a month before it was released. A few of the songs (You Are the Dope, No Feeling, Rosebud, and Warming Glow) were leftover material from BASIC, but the rest of the songs were pretty much all written all at the same time back in February or March. Only one song didn't make the final album, a song called "Monkey Spank".<br />
As for other changes, there's not much. The working titles for some songs were changed several times (as usual). Creeping Lilly was called Sux2BMe-H82BU, "Here, There, Nowhere", "Moon Ride", and Near/Far. Melodia was originally titled Tomahawk. Risky Boots was called "No Respect" and "Howdy Doody". Syntax Error was called "Gossamer Peel Shreds", "Whatever It Seems", and "Howdy Doody". Hello Trilobyte was called "Tribble", "Fossils", and "Howdy Doody". Murky Shining was "Murky Lurking", "Murky Shines", "Gossamer Peel Shreds", and "Howdy Doody". The most interesting noteworthy thing about this album is probably that several songs were at one time going to be called Howdy Doody, and in looking back, I have absolutely no idea why. Anyway, I think it's probably my best album, or at least equal with A Collection of Songs (FDOA). heebeegeebeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13691436543953333540noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1117060136660704016.post-60488394363315449472016-08-27T20:33:00.001-07:002016-08-27T20:33:41.214-07:00C.o.t.C.F. (Soundtrack) notesThe 10th anniversary album (Lum) is almost ready, but I'm going to wait until next month to talk about it, so for now here's:<br />
<br />
C.o.t.C.F. soundtrack (2011) - Except for the first song on it, this album was recorded in about an hour and a half in one night. I was working on Robot MonStar during the same time period that I was working on a short film, and was using the keyboard to come up with some ideas for the background music in the movie. I don't know if I came up with this music first or the songs on Robot MonStar, but I want to say that I came up with the main riff for "Breathe Like an Alien" on the same night I did this. The first song from the album (Boots) is more in line with my older material, because it was actually music from an unfinished song.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
heebeegeebeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13691436543953333540noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1117060136660704016.post-81565078587628876272016-07-23T19:28:00.000-07:002016-07-23T19:28:23.546-07:00i 10th anniversary notes"<i>i</i>" (2006) was the first studio album. Most of the songs were Polymer Bloom-era songs, except for Spage which was 100% new material for the album. "Terrapin Drop" and ""Pleasantries & Other Such Things" were never officially performed by Polymer Bloom, but rough demos were recorded, and "Briney" was only performed during a couple of the last few rehearsals. "Manvoice" was originally supposed to be a "Hardcore" Devo style song, that I came up with around 2001/2002, and eventually rewritten a few years later. It was going to be performed at the first "all-new" Polymer Bloom show in mid-2005 (which featured several new songs, and a new bass player) but that show was canceled after the band split up, which incidentally was the day of that show.<br />
<br />
The first two tracks recorded for "<i>i</i>" were Manvoice and Fester. While the first albums was recorded and mixed in a very amateur manner, I always thought these first two songs stand out as slightly more competent than the rest. Some others, like Brown Towel, were a little more rough around the edges. Two of the tracks on that recording (I think the drums and guitar) had been recorded on an analog 4-track, and then copied onto a digital 8-track, where the bass and the vocals were added several months later. Which is a shame, because it's a fun song, and deserves a better quality recording than what it has. I may George Lucas it in the future...heebeegeebeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13691436543953333540noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1117060136660704016.post-43539973344443472582016-06-12T12:46:00.000-07:002016-06-12T12:46:15.094-07:00ii notesii (2008) was the second album. It was very similar to the first album, as it features a mix of Polymer Bloom era songs, as well as some newer songs at the time. Bubble Unit and Seed were played frequently with Polymer Bloom, as they were two of the oldest songs. Lost at Home and Spratt's Medium were fairly old bust played less sporadically. New York Simon Underground, Spoiler Monkey, and Lilac Stray were introduced around the time just before Polymer Bloom broke up. Art, Galaxian, and Interlude were all new songs written for the album.heebeegeebeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13691436543953333540noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1117060136660704016.post-24784721202594153342016-05-14T15:50:00.002-07:002016-05-14T15:50:22.168-07:00iii notesiii (2009) was the third album. I really don't care much for this one. It starts off okay, but then gets cringe-inducingly bad. The first half of the album (up through "Wednesday") features all new material, but then a lot of leftover throw-away songs from the "Polymer Bloom" days, and other half-ass demos make up the second half of the album. At that point in time I was just trying to record as many songs as I could, and after a certain amount, I would collect them together for an album. So after getting 14-15 rough demos together I figured I had a new album ready. I set a release date for a few weeks later to give me time to work on cover art, and semi-promote it. Then about 10 days before it came out I realized it sounded over half the songs sounded absolutely terrible. It would have taken a while to re-record everything from scratch, and I really should have, but I didn't. Instead I tried to fix individual parts of songs, and the results were sloppy. Also, the audio mix is probably the worst I've ever done. It's a way too tinny sounding, and actually hurts my ears. I don't know why I set a release date, maybe it was a personal challenge or something, but I did learn to never set an exact date set in stone for something that doesn't exist yet.heebeegeebeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13691436543953333540noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1117060136660704016.post-50447984778705522762016-04-20T16:20:00.001-07:002016-06-12T12:46:35.162-07:00iv notesiv (2010) was the fourth album, and was the last of the numbered albums as well as the first of the non-numbered ones. It's a bit different style-wise than the previous albums, and the songs had a lot more time spent working on them up to that point. It was my favorite up until 'A Collection of Songs For Dancing or Amusement' but I still think it's pretty good, especially following the unpolished turd that was 'iii'. All of the songs were completely new, non-Polymer Bloom songs, although early ideas for shaved + tame were originally recorded during some of the later sessions for 'iii'. Grendel King was written on Christmas Eve 2009, a few hours before a live acoustic performance, and Retro Space-Age Future Vision was written later that night after the performance was canceled. My personal favorite songs from the album are: Pink Rattle, Buzzkill, Thing, Retro Space-Age Future Vision, and Plastic Ono.heebeegeebeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13691436543953333540noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1117060136660704016.post-20047634519105214832016-03-20T17:02:00.000-07:002016-03-20T17:02:12.597-07:00A Collection of Songs For Dancing or Amusements NotesA Collection of Songs For Dancing and Amusements (2013) was the sixth album, released on November 12, 2013. It is my personal favorite. The songs on it were meant to be more structured and complex than previous ones, while still trying to maintain a sense of simplicity. With a couple of the songs, namely <i>Goofy's Lament</i> and <i>Hrt & Soul</i>, they started out as a bunch of several, similar sounding songs that were somewhat lacking in various ways, and were combined into one song. <i>Heart & Soul</i> was originally part of an outtake song from some recordings done between 'iv' and 'Robot MonStar'. <i>Drool a Puddle</i> is the first instrumental song on an album, but it was originally going to have lyrics, though none were ever written. The version of <i>Medical Needs</i> that appears is from a pair of recordings done in September 2012. The other song was terrible and has never been released, but it was eventually drastically re-worked in 2014 and ended up becoming <i>Some Moments of Violins </i>from 2014's 'Basic' EP.heebeegeebeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13691436543953333540noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1117060136660704016.post-85453680311038528252016-02-13T14:48:00.001-08:002016-05-14T15:21:23.714-07:00Basic NotesBASIC (2014) was the seventh album, though it's technically only an EP. It was the spiritual successor to Robot MonStar, and was likewise a concept album in many ways. While Robot MonStar's main sound was of a more robotic and mechanical nature, Basic was supposed to be more primal and primitive. Originally it was intended to sound like a post-punk/new wave DIY compilation album, which were semi-prevalent at one time period (like the 'Killed By Death' compilations), with the more raw guitar oriented songs making up the second half, or B-side of the album. It sounded good on paper, but felt too disjointed when listened to as a whole. I abandoned the idea midway through production, and focused on the keyboard songs. Warning Light, originally titled "No Warning" was an example of the style of songs from the aborted second half of the album, although it remained on the final version.<br />
I thought about having all of the song titles follow one of 2 types of name patterns. Pattern A songs were all titled "___ of ___" (Matter of Tact; Monster of Noise, etc.), and would make up the first half of the album. Pattern B songs would be on the second half of the album, and were all titled "No ___" (No Violins; No Warning, etc). Some of those remained for the final versions, like "Matter of Tact", and "Monster of Noise". "Moments of Violins" was originally titled "No Violins". "Warning Light" was called "No Warning", and "Future Arcade" was originally called "No Words".<br />
<br />
Although BASIC was supposed to have been twice as long, had it included the planned second half, I decided to play off the name and make it the most minimalist version of an album I could. (Also, because I'm lazy.) It would have around 8 songs or so, and run just on the borderline between full length LP and short play EP. And once again, because I like gimmicky things, the title BASIC also was meant to signify that it's mostly features songs of an electronic/computerized type as well. I think it's a pretty good album, but it went in several directions during it's production. I was still restructuring it up till a couple days before it's release. Some of the cut songs included, "You Are the Dope", "Meanie Beanie", "Aurora Bearing Malice", "Kitty Spit-Up", "Circle Squares", 'No Feeling', "Sound of Television/warming glow", 'generic pop fair' and a couple others. Another short EP with the deleted songs was planned, but pushed to the side temporarily. A few of these songs have turned up since then in various forms.heebeegeebeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13691436543953333540noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1117060136660704016.post-22120519585422647482016-01-27T12:29:00.001-08:002016-01-27T12:29:45.458-08:00Radioset 10th anniversary and more notes<div class="MsoNormal">
While last year marked the 10th/or 11th? anniversary of the
first live show, this year marks 10 years since the first Radioset studio album
was released. So this year I'll actually update the blog (or whatever those
things are called now) with random facts about the albums and things. And today I'll do Robot MonStar...</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
Robot MonStar (2011) was the fifth album. It was meant to be
a concept album, surrounding themes of science and sci-fi, and sound very
electronic and mechanical. I wanted it to be very Devo influenced. I had gotten
access to a keyboard, and spent some time playing around with it, figuring out
how to play stuff and playing with the different effects settings. I discovered
one that sounded really new wave, and kind of 8-bit. I came up with the idea
for the song <i>Quark</i>, and then went on
from there, coming up with similar material for a "new-wave" album. I
had a lot of ideas for gimmicks, like song titles that were highly complex math
equations. The release date of Nov. 1 was chosen so as to look like a binary
sequence (110111) when written. The album wasn’t ready in time for release in
October, due to the cover art not being complete, but ideally I would have
liked to have it out on Oct. 1 (100111), or Oct. 10 (101011). The album title was
supposed to reflect the mechanical and science/sci-fi elements. MonStar is the
name of the main villain from the mid-eighties Rankin-Bass outer-space cyborg
action cartoon, Silverhawks; and Robot Monster is the name of a 1950's sci-fi
film. The album was meant to be longer, but I was working on it at the same
time as a video project, and that ate into a lot of the time. A couple of
orphaned song ideas ending up in the video instead of being finished for the
album. But I think it holds up pretty well, and I still like it.</div>
heebeegeebeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13691436543953333540noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1117060136660704016.post-78431554427501494992012-11-25T12:52:00.000-08:002012-11-25T12:52:42.755-08:00Fleischer AnimationI'm a huge fan of quality animation, and a lot of the early golden age of sound animation during 1930's is some of the best ever produced, despite the limitations of the time period. While several animation studios were around at that time, the top two were Disney and Fleischer. Everyone knows Disney, but the Fleischer's name isn't as well-known nowadays, though many of their creations, such as Betty Boop and Popeye, are. I like the Fleischer Studio's animation best, mainly due to the surrealness of them, and the fact that they advanced techniques, such as rotoscoping and the stero-optic processes. It was miles beyond what Disney was doing, and far more interesting in my opinion. Unfortunately things didn't last as they fell victim to the Hays Production Code, and corporate buyout by Paramount. The new management began downgrading the quality of the work and, and making all types of changes to the titles they had obtained. Eventually their popular franchises became just namesake without the heart and soul of the original. Another testament to what happens when money becomes the primary motivation. <br /><br /><object height="385" width="480"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PqVP8a5C0V0?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param>
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PqVP8a5C0V0?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>heebeegeebeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13691436543953333540noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1117060136660704016.post-91550393960124367612012-08-23T16:23:00.000-07:002012-08-23T19:24:10.345-07:00Radioset notes (part ii): Robot MonStarThis is probably about a year late, but here's some notes about the latest studio album, Robot MonStar:<br />
<a href="http://s1036.photobucket.com/albums/a446/gingamaster/?action=view&current=robotmonstar.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i1036.photobucket.com/albums/a446/gingamaster/robotmonstar.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
- It was intended to be a new wave/sci-fi concept album.<br />
- The title is based off of the 1953 monster film Robot Monster, and Mon*Star, the main villain from the 1986 Silverhawks animated series.<br />
- The release date (Nov. 1, 2011) was chosen because it looked like binary code when written (110111).<br />
- The album has a shorter run-time, since filming/music was also being done at the same time on the short horror film, "Curse of the Chicken Fucker".<br />
- Complex mathematical equations were considered being used as song titles early on.<br />
- The album cover was taken from the first in a series of link-able paintings:<br />
<a href="http://s1036.photobucket.com/albums/a446/gingamaster/?action=view&current=paints.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i1036.photobucket.com/albums/a446/gingamaster/paints.jpg" /></a>heebeegeebeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13691436543953333540noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1117060136660704016.post-50454305412623511142012-05-26T17:32:00.003-07:002012-05-26T18:16:01.658-07:00Radioset notesConsidering that this was set up as a blog for Radioset fans, I guess I should post something related to my music... So here's miscellaneous info:<br />
<br />
The <i>'Demos & Other Such Things'</i> box-set released last month is almost all of the unreleased material from the past 10 years. But a few thing weren't included on it, because they were either too incomplete, or already represented on it in some way, or just sucked way too much. (There was also a different, guitar version of Quark that wasn't included, because I had forgotten about it until a few days ago.) So anyway, here's what didn't make the cut:<br />
Sunday Drive (acoustic home demo of 'Pleasantries and Other Such Things' - 11/2004)<b>;</b> Household Drugs (acoustic home demo - 11/2004)<b>;</b> Milk Glass (acoustic home demo - 11/2004)<b>;</b> the version of Manvoice included on 'Disc 3', but with weird lyrics<b>;</b> a later version of Milk Glass with the chorus line from Breathe Like An Alien<b>;</b> an early, noisy, solo version of Terrapin Drop from early 2005<b>;</b> a very bland and repetitive song from 2007<b>;</b> a short demo of Nocturnal Emissionary<b>;</b> the acoustic improve that ended up becoming Retro Space-Age Future Station (Christmas eve 2009)<b>;</b> the <i>ivy demo</i> of Violent Afterbirth<b>;</b> instrumental practice demos of Faraway and Machine Automatic<b>;</b> 2 untitled songs from Fall 2009<b>;</b> and several hours of lo-fi Polymer Bloom rehearsals from 2004-2005. There's also a tape somewhere from towards the end of the Polymer Bloom era as 3-piece, that has recordings of Manvoice, New York Simon Underground, Briney, and Lilac Stray that may or may not exist anymore. The tape was borrowed and never returned so...heebeegeebeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13691436543953333540noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1117060136660704016.post-45181307317469206172012-05-01T21:29:00.001-07:002012-05-01T21:29:34.625-07:00free speech, blah, blah, blah...Every now and then you see or hear about something that someone has said or done that will make most rational people raise an questioning eyebrow toward. And then that person always goes on to claim they have the "right" to have done what they did, because it's protected by the 1st amendment. While I agree that everyone has those freedoms, I believe that anyone who has to claim that their actions are protected by said freedom is merely using it as a shield to act irresponsibly. Free speech was instituted so you could speak negatively about the government without being hanged. It has nothing to do with being able to irresponsibly vomit arrogant beliefs, opinions, and personal interests in the public's face like so many people use it for now. First, the government doesn't give people rights, - they're privileges. And like all privileges, if it's abused then it can be further restricted or taken away altogether. People have less rights today than they did just 100 years ago. And by that, I'm not referring to voting rights, segregation, or those rights given/taken from just minorities or women. I'm referring to rules and regulations that are applied to everyone when certain members of society can't act responsibly and with respect towards others using their own free-will. True freedom isn't issued by a government, it's something an individual has unto themselves. And with true freedom comes responsibility, and should be used in such a way.heebeegeebeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13691436543953333540noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1117060136660704016.post-61876443900040334032012-03-31T17:15:00.000-07:002012-03-31T17:15:42.511-07:00Sgt. Pepper Album Cover PhotosThe other day I was looking at my Beatles Sgt. Pepper's album trying to see how many of the people I could recognize. Anyway I did some searching on the internet, to try to identify the ones I didn't know, and I noticed that a lot of sites ID'd the guy in the yellow derby as Oliver Hardy. But no one seemed to be 100% sure. I'm a huge Laurel & Hardy fan, as well as an aficionado of silent movies as well, and I wasn't convinced. First, all the pictures on the cover were sourced from actual photos, and the pretty much all of those source photos have been identified, except that one, and I've never seen a picture or movie with Oliver Hardy in a yellow Derby. Nor does it look even remotely like him. I think it's more likely to be Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle. Here's my reasoning:<br />
1. The picture is most likely from the early/mid silent era, since the guy is wearing makeup which was common during that time in order to be seen better on film. Oliver Hardy did do early silent movies, but he wasn't as fat as the guy pictured during that time period.<br />
2. Just because Stan Laurel is pictured two space over doesn't mean it's Oliver Hardy. If it was, I'm sure they could have gotten a much better picture (why not use the one they got Laurel's picture from - picured below). And, if you consider my first argument, Laurel and Hardy weren't an offical team until about 1928, right at the end of the silent era. Heavy makeup wasn't as common then, due to improvements in cameras and lighting.<br />
3. Oliver Hardy never wore a yellow Derby. He's worn yellow Kangals, and other types of hats, but only black as far as Derbys go. Fatty Arbuckle did wear a light colored Derby, however.<br />
<br />
I played around with the picture, comparing and contrasting images, and even trying to make it look more like Oliver Hardy by coloring the Derby black, removing the makeup, and adding a moustache... but now I'm even more confused. (BTW, the sites that claim it's Hardy, source Wikipedia - but Wikipedia uses those same sites that source it, as it's source of info... And if you change any of that information, so as to try to correct or highlight any possible inaccuracies, a mod will change it back so their little cycle of misinformation can continue.)<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://s1036.photobucket.com/albums/a446/gingamaster/?action=view&current=beatles-sgt-pepper-2.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="Photobucket" border="0" src="http://i1036.photobucket.com/albums/a446/gingamaster/beatles-sgt-pepper-2.jpg" /></a>heebeegeebeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13691436543953333540noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1117060136660704016.post-26857729130747314232012-03-28T11:51:00.001-07:002012-03-28T11:51:53.318-07:00Butthole Surfers 1981-1982I like their early stuff better. There's a ton of it out there now that's been liberated from bootleggers. Thank god for the internet.<br />
These demos are: I Don't Know Why, (unknown title), and I Fuck Your Wife:<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/F8UmbH5DfnQ" width="420"></iframe><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=1117060136660704016">Publish Post</a>heebeegeebeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13691436543953333540noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1117060136660704016.post-44844732553770104672012-02-29T18:21:00.000-08:002012-02-29T18:21:30.374-08:00Chalk CircleJust stumbled across this very cool, old girlpunk band while looking for albums. Going to have to build a time machine eventually.<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/gq908MBQSSk" width="560"></iframe>heebeegeebeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13691436543953333540noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1117060136660704016.post-87171775599025663032012-01-30T19:58:00.000-08:002012-01-30T19:58:58.305-08:00Kool-StuffEverytime I see a modern packet of Kool-Aid or a Kool-Aid commercial, one of the first things I notice is the Kool-Aid Man's pants. I still don't understand why he started wearing them, but I guess it's nice to know that he changes them from time to time. When he first started wearing pants back in the nineties, he wore some pretty tight-fitting jeans. Now he's switched to some loose fitting khakis. And they look even more awkward. I remember when I was a kid, he never wore pants, so I hope that doesn't have any affect on me somehow when I'm middle-aged. Anyway, while I was doing my research (without using wikipedia) to try and figure out when he started wearing pants, and I came across some interesting things. First in the 50's when Kool-Aid commercials started airing, he was just a pitcher of liquid, without any legs. Then, during the 70's he suddenly had arms and legs - but no pants. Then in the early 90's he was wearing some tightass jeans. And then sometime during this past decade, he switched to loose-fit khakis. I think this means that every 20 years the Kool-Aid Man evolves, and grows more humanoid in form. Does this mean that during the 90's, he developed some sort of Kool-Thing? Or Kool-Bits? Well, during my extensivly in-depth Kool-Aid study, I also found out that he has a mom and a semi-retarded brother that's shaped like a box. I believe this further validates my hypothesis. Oh, and he wears a shirt sometimes too. Which after seeing, it manages to make him look even creepier in just pants without the shirt. This wouldn't even be an issue if he had just never worn the damn pants in the first place. So, whatever, I'm stopping now before I force myself into therapy.<br />
<br />
<object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ke3zbUV92rg&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ke3zbUV92rg&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>heebeegeebeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13691436543953333540noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1117060136660704016.post-69167407488633482052012-01-10T16:01:00.000-08:002012-01-10T16:01:05.566-08:00Beat HappeningI can't believe I only just discovered Beat Happening within the past year. I've always wanted to do some songs with female vox in Radioset, but no one seems to be interested:<br />
<br />
<object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/InkVxDNkris&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/InkVxDNkris&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>heebeegeebeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13691436543953333540noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1117060136660704016.post-33201487922609111812011-12-30T15:47:00.001-08:002011-12-30T16:00:16.649-08:00PetticoatsThe Petticoats are pretty cool:<br />
<br />
<object height="315" width="420"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/eTyFXdeeHmU?version=3&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/eTyFXdeeHmU?version=3&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="420" height="315" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>heebeegeebeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13691436543953333540noreply@blogger.com0